National Crimes: A New National Lynching Dataset

Charles Seguin, Pennsylvania State University
David Rigby, University of North Carolina

Historians are increasingly studying lynching outside of the American Southeast, but sociologists have been slow to follow. We introduce a new public dataset, which extends existing data on lynching victims to cover the contiguous United States from 1883-1941. These data confirm that lynching was a heterogeneous practice across the US. We differentiate between three different regimes over this period: a Wild West regime, characterized mostly by the lynching of whites in areas with weak state penetration; a slavery regime found in former slave states, characterized mostly by the lynching of blacks; and a third minor regime characterized by the lynching of Mexican nationals mostly along the Texas-Mexico border. We also note great variability at the county level in the extent of lynching. By contrast, we find very little state-level variability in lynching once local and regional regimes are considered. We discuss the implications of local and regional heterogeneity for quantitative lynching research using these data.

No extended abstract or paper available

 Presented in Session 245. New Data and New Perspectives on Mob Violence