Andy Hinde, University of Southampton
This paper provides a synthesis and overview of recent work on the Victorian English workhouse. It draws on many local studies of individual workhouses in English counties including Hampshire, Kent, Hertfordshire, Lancashire; and studies of the different functions performed by the workhouse. The central theme of the paper is that the widespread perception of the workhouse as the forbidding external face of a harsh and unforgiving social and economic policy is too simplistic. While there is no doubt that the creation of a nationwide system of workhouses marked an assault by the establishment on the ‘able-bodied poor’, the operation of the workhouse system in practice was complicated, and workhouses fulfilled many functions, some of which were beneficial even to the poor they were supposed to deter. The paper explores several sub-themes. (1) The origins of the workhouse system in the years leading up to the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834. (2) The operation of the ‘workhouse test’ in practice. (3) Who ended up in the workhouses? Workhouse populations in much of England were dominated by orphan children, the aged poor (especially males) and unmarried mothers. These were groups of people for whom the alternatives were worse, for whom the workhouse test failed. (4) The agency of the poor. The poor were not passive recipients of benefits. They could (and did) exploit the operation of the system for their own advantage, for example the use of workhouse lying-in facilities by unmarried mothers. (5) Functions of the workhouses. Workhouses performed many functions: they were partly childrens’ homes, isolation hospitals, asylums, and eventually old people’s homes. Some of these functions were provided by no other institutions, and formed a vital safety net not just for the poor, but for the whole of the communities within which they lay.
Presented in Session 92. A History of the Labor Force